The 12 questions that separate PPC agencies who actually understand peptide compliance from ones who will learn it live on your account — plus contract terms worth scrutinizing before you sign.
Every peptide brand founder we talk to has the same story. They hired a PPC agency — sometimes a generalist, sometimes one that claimed “supplement experience” — and within a few weeks the account was flagged, disapproved, or suspended outright. The agency shrugged, blamed Google, and moved on to the next client while the brand was left rebuilding an account from zero.
This isn’t bad luck. It’s a predictable outcome of hiring a PPC agency that doesn’t actually understand the peptide category before you’ve verified that they do.
The problem is that almost every agency says they understand compliance. Sales calls are full of confident language about “proven frameworks” and “policy expertise.” The only way to actually tell the difference between an agency that can run a compliant, scalable Google Ads account for a peptide brand and one that will burn your account history in month one is to ask the right questions before you sign anything.
Here are the 12 questions that matter — and what a genuinely qualified answer sounds like for each one.
Most PPC agency vetting checklists are written for e-commerce in general — questions about reporting cadence, communication style, and case studies. Those questions still matter, but they miss the thing that actually determines whether a peptide brand succeeds or fails with paid media: whether the agency understands the compliance landscape well enough to build an account that survives Google’s review systems long-term.
An agency can be excellent at general e-commerce PPC and still be completely unprepared for the peptide category. The skill sets don’t automatically transfer. Standard e-commerce accounts don’t get flagged for using the word “recovery.” Standard e-commerce accounts don’t need negative keyword lists built specifically to avoid triggering pharmaceutical policy review. Standard e-commerce accounts don’t need a cold-start bidding strategy that accounts for the fact that Smart Bidding can behave unpredictably on a restricted-category account with thin conversion data.
That’s why the questions below go deeper than “show me your case studies.” They’re designed to expose whether the agency has actually done this work before — or whether they’re about to learn it live, on your account, with your ad spend.
This is the baseline filter. You’re not looking for a number in isolation — you’re looking for specificity in the answer. A qualified agency will name the general shape of the accounts (without violating NDAs): account size, whether the brands were research-grade or supplement-framed, how long the engagements ran, and what happened to those accounts over time.
Red flag answer: “We’ve worked with a lot of supplement and health brands.” This is vague on purpose — it usually means the agency has adjacent experience, not peptide-specific experience.
Good answer: “We currently manage three peptide accounts ranging from $8K to $95K in monthly spend, two research-grade and one supplement-framed. All three have been live for over six months without an account-level suspension.”
You want to hear a process, not a hope. Agencies that have actually navigated peptide compliance have a documented response sequence: reviewing the disapproval reason, editing the specific flagged language, resubmitting, and appealing when appropriate — all within a defined time window.
Red flag answer: “We just try not to get flagged.” Everyone tries not to get flagged. The question is what happens when it inevitably occurs, because in this category, it will.
Good answer: A specific, step-by-step description of their disapproval response protocol, including turnaround time commitments.
This question filters out agencies that treat negative keywords purely as a spend-efficiency tool. In the peptide category, negative keywords also protect your account from queries that could trigger unwanted policy review — medical condition terms, prescription-adjacent language, and injection-specific queries.
A qualified agency should be able to describe a negative keyword list that goes well beyond standard irrelevant-traffic terms and into compliance-protective terms.
New accounts have no conversion history, and restricted-category accounts are especially vulnerable to Smart Bidding making erratic decisions with thin data. An agency that understands this will describe a manual-bidding-first approach: building conversion volume on Manual CPC before migrating to Target ROAS or Target CPA once a reliable conversion threshold is hit.
Red flag answer: “We turn on Smart Bidding from day one for all accounts.” This works fine for a mainstream e-commerce account with plenty of budget and no compliance risk. It’s a common and expensive mistake for a peptide brand.
Compliance isn’t just about the ad — Google reviews the landing page the ad points to. An agency that only thinks about ad copy and ignores landing page alignment is setting you up for disapprovals that seem to come out of nowhere. Ask to see an actual example, even anonymized, and look for the specific compliance elements: research-use disclosures, absence of specific health-outcome claims, visible trust signals like a Certificate of Analysis.
This question tests whether the agency treats account risk as a shared problem or as something they’ll disclaim responsibility for. You’re not necessarily looking for a guarantee — no honest agency can promise zero suspensions in this category — but you are looking for a clear answer about what support looks like during a suspension: appeal drafting, documentation support, and a rebuild plan if the appeal fails.
Read our recovery playbook for what a competent suspension response actually looks like, so you know what to expect from a partner who’s handled this before.
You want to hear about the separation between branded search, high-intent non-brand search, informational non-brand search, Shopping, and remarketing — and specifically why that separation matters more in a restricted category than it would for, say, a apparel brand. If the answer sounds identical to how they’d describe any e-commerce account structure, that’s a signal they haven’t adapted their approach to the category’s actual risk profile.
This is a standard question for any agency, but it matters more here because compliance-related account health should be part of the reporting, not just ROAS and spend. Ask specifically whether disapproval rates, policy strikes, and account health status will be included in regular reporting — not just performance metrics.
If you’re a Google Ads–only brand, this question matters for a different reason: it tells you whether the agency is really specialized in the compliance nuances of your specific channel, or whether they’re spreading a generalist playbook across multiple platforms without going deep on any one of them. An agency that’s genuinely expert in Google Ads compliance for peptides should be able to go deep immediately, without pivoting the conversation to Meta.
Be wary of any agency that promises fast scaling in the first 30 days. In a restricted category, the responsible approach is a deliberate build-up: manual bidding, conservative budget increases, and careful monitoring before aggressive scaling. An agency promising rapid results in month one is either inexperienced with the category’s realities or willing to take compliance risks to hit a number.
References matter in every industry, but they matter more here because the failure mode (account suspension) is so visible and costly. A reference call with a current peptide brand client will tell you more in ten minutes than any case study deck. If the agency hesitates or can’t produce a reference in this specific category, treat that as meaningful information.
This question is designed to surface honesty. An agency that’s actually run these accounts will describe both — a bad month might include a policy update that required copy revisions across active campaigns, or a temporary disapproval that took a few days to resolve. An agency that only describes upside, with no acknowledgment of the operational reality of running ads in a restricted category, likely hasn’t lived through it.
Before you even get to the 12 questions, look closely at three things in the proposed contract itself, because they tell you almost as much as the interview does.
Minimum retainer length. A month-to-month arrangement, or a short initial term (30–60 days) with an easy exit, signals an agency confident enough in its own compliance track record to let results speak. A 12-month lock-in with steep early-termination penalties, especially from an agency that couldn’t answer questions 1–3 with specificity, should raise questions about what happens if the account gets suspended in month two.
Who owns the account. Confirm, in writing, that the Google Ads account itself — along with historical data, conversion tracking setup, and audience lists — belongs to you, not the agency. Agencies that build and retain ownership of the account under their own manager account can make it painful (or impossible) to leave cleanly if the relationship doesn’t work out. This matters more in a restricted category, where account history itself carries value.
Spend commitment versus management fee structure. Understand whether the agency is paid a flat fee, a percentage of spend, or a hybrid — and whether there’s pressure, implicit or explicit, to increase spend faster than the account’s compliance maturity and conversion data actually support. An agency paid purely as a percentage of ad spend has a built-in incentive to scale budget aggressively, which is precisely the wrong instinct in a category where slow, conversion-data-backed scaling protects account health.
None of these three items disqualify an agency on their own. But combined with vague answers to the questions above, they compound into real risk.
Score each answer on specificity, not confidence. Confident, vague answers are a warning sign. Specific answers — even ones that admit limitations, past disapprovals, or lessons learned — are the actual signal of an agency that has done this work for real.
If an agency answers all 12 questions with specific, credible detail, you’ve likely found a partner who understands the category. If they answer most of these with generalities, marketing language, or a pivot to unrelated case studies, you’re looking at an agency that will learn the peptide category on your account, at your expense.
We’ve built and scaled Google Ads accounts for peptide brands from zero to five figures in monthly spend while maintaining policy compliance throughout — and we’re happy to answer every one of these questions directly on a call, with specifics, not marketing language.
The term “PPC agency” gets used loosely. Some agencies use it to mean they can technically turn on ads across any platform. For a category this specific, that’s not enough. What you actually want is an agency where PPC for peptide brands is a core specialization — not a service line they added because a client asked.
That distinction shows up in the small details: the negative keyword lists, the account structure, the way they talk about landing pages, and how calmly they describe handling a disapproval. Those are the signals that separate a generalist agency running ads for your brand from a specialist agency built around this exact category.
If you’re currently vetting agencies, or if you’re already working with one and something about the answers above feels uncomfortably familiar, our full guide to choosing a PPC agency for peptide brands covers the broader decision framework this article builds on. And if you’re wondering whether it’s time to move on from your current agency, here’s how to recognize the signs.
Print this list. Bring it to every discovery call. The agency’s willingness to answer these directly — and the specificity of what they say — will tell you more than any pitch deck.
Want a straight answer to all 12 of these questions, from a team that actually runs peptide brand Google Ads accounts every day?
Book a free 30-minute audit. We’ll walk through your current account (or your launch plan if you’re starting fresh) and tell you honestly what we see — no charge, no commitment.
Or email directly: sveta@oney.studio
Oney Studio is a Google Ads specialist agency for peptide and research chemical brands. We build and manage compliant, scalable paid search accounts for regulated e-commerce brands — from cold-start launches to six-figure monthly spend.
Get a free 30-minute audit of your Google Ads or Meta Ads account. We’ll review compliance, structure, and growth opportunities — no strings attached.
Book a Free Audit